Tax Advice

Sponsored By:

   The Nation  |  Business  |  Equipment  |  Features

ATRI: FMCSA study on new HOS raises enough red flags to warrant review

ATRI's study on FMCSA's field report on the new HOS turned up numerous data conflicts within the report.

The Trucker News Services


ARLINGTON, Va. — The American Transportation Research Institute Tuesday released the findings of its independent evaluation of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s field study report on the new Hours of Service rules and takes issue with several aspects of the study.

The FMCSA study was undertaken at the direction of Congress as part of MAP-21 and was designed to study the efficacy of the restart provisions which went into effect July 1, 2013.

The FMCSA’s field study collected fatigue measurements from 106 truck drivers during two duty cycles that included two restart breaks.

According to the ATRI report, the FMCSA said that its field study results supported the new restart rule.

But following a detailed evaluation of the report, ATRI officials said it identified a variety of technical issues related to research design flaws, validity of measurement techniques and interpretations and data conflicts within and across the study.  

Norita Taylor, a spokesperson for the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, said of the report that “Their findings appear to agree with the skepticism we’ve expressed previously about the field study. The study is not applicable or relevant to the majority of the trucking population since it did not represent those actually affected by the regulations.”

ATRI’s Technical Memorandum documents the following issues with FMCSA’s report:

• The field study report purports to have measured differences between restarts with one and two nighttime periods (1 a.m. to 5 .a.m.) but instead measured differences in restarts that range from 34 hours to an unknown/non-limited number of hours off-duty.

• MAP-21 required that the field study be “representative of the drivers and motor carriers regulated by the Hours of Service regulations” but the study includes, on average, less than 12 days’ worth of data for each of only 106 drivers.

• The FMCSA field study does not present research to support the limitation of the use of the 34-hour restart to once per week (168 hours).

• Use of the 3-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) showed lapses of attention by drivers in both duty cycle groups, but offered no link between the average number of lapses, fatigue and the safe operation of commercial vehicles.

• The two duty cycle groups had lane deviation measurements that differed by 1/10th of a centimeter and the study authors provided no evidence that these findings are relevant or have a nexus to driver fatigue in either of the two groups.

• The difference in sleep obtained by the two duty cycle groups on their restart breaks differed by only six minutes per 24-hour period.

• Average driver scores on the subjective sleepiness scale did not indicate any level of sleepiness.

• The study confirms that drivers in the “two or more nighttime” group are more likely to drive during the day; a time when FMCSA’s own data shows a higher crash risk.

“FMCSA has heard loud and clear from carriers and drivers that the new rules are not advancing safety and are creating additional stress and fatigue on the part of truck drivers,” commented Steve Rush, president of Carbon Express Inc. in Wharton, N.J.  “ATRI’s analysis raises enough questions about FMCSA’s own study that should compel a comprehensive review of the entire rule.”

The Trucker staff can be reached to comment on this article at

Find more news and analysis from The Trucker, and share your thoughts, on Facebook.