Sponsored By:

   The Nation  |  Business  |  Equipment  |  Features

OOIDA wants court to review 'de facto' fatigue regulation

OOIDA wants the FMCSA to inform state law enforcement agencies that drivers cannot be put out of service based on reasonable articulable suspicion, which is a lesser standard than probable cause.

The Trucker News Services


GRAIN VALLEY, Mo. — The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit asking the court to throw out a “de facto” final rule on fatigued driving, the organization’s Land Line Magazine has reported.

The lawsuit stems from a letter signed by Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Administrator Anne Ferro and sent to OOIDA President Jim Johnston.

 The magazine said that Johnston had pressed the agency in two letters written on June 12 and Sept. 12 to step in and reject the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s current out-of-service criteria for fatigue and for the agency to seek an immediate rescission of the amended out-of-service criteria.

Johnston wanted the FMCSA to inform state law enforcement agencies that drivers cannot be put out of service based on reasonable articulable suspicion, which is a lesser standard than probable cause. And, finally, Johnston requested that all individual driver fatigue out-of-service violations since April be removed from the Pre-Employment Screening Program database.

The FMCSA declined to prohibit agencies from placing drivers out of service for fatigue and stated no records containing fatigue out-of-service violations would be purged.

Land Line noted that the letter did indicate that the agency officials would communicate the agency’s “position regarding the propriety of the fatigued driver criteria” to CVSA, but that position would not be discussed with OOIDA, which was a litigant against the Minnesota State Patrol and CVSA regarding fatigue enforcement and the out-of-service criteria at the time the letter was written.

OOIDA contends in the petition for review filed with the DC Circuit on Dec. 21 that the letter is an agency action that adopts a performance-based regulation regarding fatigue – without going through the rulemaking process.





That performance-based standard authorizes enforcement officials to place drivers out of service.

“That performance-based standard essentially allows officers to ignore the hours-of-service regulations and the logbook, and make an assumption or a determination that the driver is too fatigued to continue driving,” Johnston told “Land Line Now,” the association’s radio program.

Establishing a performance-based standard concerning fatigue is something FMCSA has long shied away from, the article, written by Land Line Managing Editor Jami Jones, noted.

“The FMCSA and its predecessor agencies have repeatedly stated in various rulemaking proceedings that there is no adequate scientific or medical basis that would allow enforcement officers in the field to determine whether an individual driver is too fatigued to operate a vehicle safely,” OOIDA’s petition for review states. “Proposals to establish a performance based criteria for fatigue detection and regulation have always been rejected in favor of further study.”

The magazine article said running counter to that long-standing position, the FMCSA letter implements a new rule or new interpretation of the regulations and establishes a performance-based standard by approving the use of 392.3 as the basis for an out-of-service order – without notice or comment.

The FMCSA letter “constitutes a de facto amendment to its regulation without notice and comment rulemaking,” OOIDA’s petition states.

The Trucker staff can be reached to comment on this article at editor@thetrucker.com.

Find more news and analysis from The Trucker, and share your thoughts, on Facebook.