TheTrucker.com

Fuel price shocks ripple through freight markets

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Fuel price shocks ripple through freight markets
Rising fuel costs trigger volatility in transportation sectors.

ATLANTA, Ga. — AFS Logistics and TD Cowen are announcing the third quarter (Q3) 2026 release of the TD Cowen/AFS Freight Index, a snapshot with predictive pricing for truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL) and parcel transportation markets.

“With this edition of the freight index, the fuel numbers tell the story. In Q2, diesel prices rose about 51% compared to January and February levels, while jet fuel prices were up 90% compared to Q2 of last year,” says Andy Dyer, CEO, AFS. “Beyond the direct impact of higher freight bills paid by shippers, these price movements also have second-order effects that squeeze rates higher. Smaller truckload carriers working on tight margins may park trucks and wait for fuel prices to revert to more palatable levels before returning to operation, further restraining capacity amid a supply-side market correction.”

This quarter’s index shows the effects of oil price shocks rippling through shipping markets, with Q2 data showing rates actualized at higher-than-projected levels. Forward-looking estimates for Q3 expect rates to hold steady at elevated levels, though renewed conflict in the Middle East and the associated impact on fuel prices could threaten even higher costs.

Truckload: Continued Supply-Side Correction Drives Rates to Four-Year High

Despite some encouraging signs, a demand-driven recovery is yet to materialize. The American Trucking Association’s Truck Tonnage index showed the sixth-straight month of year-over-year increase in May, but that same month was also the second straight month of decline from the March peak. Macroeconomic signs show a similarly mixed outlook, with moderate gross domestic product growth but limited spending and resurgent inflation. But while demand signals remain tentative, the capacity contraction is fully underway. Heightened regulatory enforcement action has reduced the driver pool by more than 48,000 over the past year and together with continued carrier exits, is resulting in significantly tighter capacity.

That supply-side pressure and spiking fuel costs powered truckload rates to their highest levels in 15 quarters, reaching 16% above the January 2018 baseline in Q2. That capacity crunch-driven momentum is expected to continue in Q3, with the truckload rate per mile index projected to reach 17.7% — a four-year high and 11% YoY increase.

LTL: Exploding Fuel Surcharges Elevate Rates to New Highs

After one quarter of weight per shipment and cost per shipment moving in tandem in Q2, the two metrics once again de-coupled, with falling weight reflecting continued softness in industrial and manufacturing demand alongside ongoing modal shifts. But while longstanding carrier pricing discipline played a role in keeping rates elevated, significantly higher fuel prices pushed costs to new heights. The average LTL fuel surcharge in Q2 2026 surged to over 60% above the June 2025 level, driven by 51% higher diesel prices compared to the early 2026 average.

The Q2 2026 rate per pound index was projected to reach a record high, but reached even greater heights than expected, primarily driven by the prolonged conflicts in the Middle East boosting average fuel cost per pound by 46% quarter-over-quarter (QoQ). Looking ahead to Q3, the LTL rate per pound index is expected to sustain historically elevated levels and reach a new high of 76.8% above the January 2018 baseline, up 0.2% QoQ and 5.9% YoY.

“Q2 showed that carriers’ pricing strategies include the ability to not only secure rate increases and strategically valuable volumes, but capture volatile fuel costs,” says Mich Fabriga, Vice President of LTL Pricing, AFS Logistics. “But aside from fuel, the competitive landscape is experiencing some major shifts. While near-term impact may be limited, Amazon’s full-scale entry into the LTL market signals a major force for the future and the completion of the FedEx Freight spinoff frees a major player to compete without their parcel business tying their hands.”

Parcel: Surcharge Fatigue and Viable Alternatives Turn Up Competitive Pressure

Shipper frustration with seemingly constant changes to fuel, peak and other surcharges, together with the emergence of viable alternative carriers, adds up to a new era of competition in the parcel market. Regional and last-mile carriers, such as OnTrac, GLS, Spee-Dee, Veho and UniUni, more than doubled their volumes from 2024 to 2025, according to Pitney Bowes data. But of even greater significance is Amazon Supply Chain Services opening its network to external shippers. While the near-term scale of this market entry may be limited, long-term implications for the pricing power of FedEx and UPS are meaningful, particularly in segments like residential and small-to-medium-sized business where Amazon has particularly strong network density.

A Shifting Landscape

“This shifting carrier landscape is a welcome development for shippers who have long sought relief from two dominant players that seemingly moved in lockstep,” says Mingshu Bates, president of Parcel and CAO, AFS. “But capitalizing on these savings opportunities requires managing significant complexity, both in terms of navigating a carrier landscape with highly variable service offerings and geographic reach, and the technology infrastructure necessary to rate shop parcels and execute fulfillment.”

In ground parcel, continued changes to fuel surcharge tables by FedEx and UPS ensure that heightened fuel surcharge revenue holds firm even as actual diesel prices eventually fall. For example, if diesel falls to $4.00 per gallon, shippers will still pay a 24-24.5% fuel surcharge, compared to just 21% under last year’s tables. In Q2 2026, spiking diesel prices translated into average net fuel surcharge per package increasing 40% YoY. Discount levels also declined QoQ, with both FedEx and UPS tightening pricing in Q2, a reversal of the Q1 dynamic of FedEx offering deeper discounts and UPS tightening pricing. After reaching a record high of 42.4% above the January 2018 baseline in Q2 2026, the ground parcel rate per package index is projected to remain elevated but ease in line with seasonal trends, falling 2.6% QoQ to 38.7%. This Q3 figure still represents a 5.2% YoY increase, on track to make 2026 the year with the highest cost per package on record.

Elevated Fuel Surcharges

In Q2, discounting in express parcel took the opposite approach of ground. Not only did discount levels increase, but for large customers, a divergence emerged as FedEx deployed deeper discounts while UPS kept pricing tighter. But elevated fuel surcharges, higher billed weight and more premium services proved a potent formula for elevated rates, with the express parcel rate per package index reaching a new high of 15.5% above the January 2018 baseline in Q2. Looking ahead, the cumulative effect of carrier changes to measurement rounding rules and additional handling surcharge policies will keep average billed weight elevated, and demand surcharges are expected to return toward the end of Q3, adding further upward pressure. The result is another record high, with Q3 expected to reach 15.8% above the January 2018 baseline — up 11.1% y/y.

Dana Guthrie

Dana Guthrie is an award-winning journalist who has been featured in multiple newspapers, books and magazines across the globe. She is currently based in the Atlanta, Georgia, area.

Avatar for Dana Guthrie
Dana Guthrie is an award-winning journalist who has been featured in multiple newspapers, books and magazines across the globe. She is currently based in the Atlanta, Georgia, area.
For over 30 years, the objective of The Trucker editorial team has been to produce content focused on truck drivers that is relevant, objective and engaging. After reading this article, feel free to leave a comment about this article or the topics covered in this article for the author or the other readers to enjoy. Let them know what you think! We always enjoy hearing from our readers.

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE