TheTrucker.com

What the trucking industry thinks about EPA’s decision to drop DEF sensor requirement

Reading Time: 2 minutes
What the trucking industry thinks about EPA’s decision to drop DEF sensor requirement
Trucking industry reacts to EPA's DEF sensor removal.

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is removing the Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) sensor requirement due to “faulty DEF systems.”

“Failing DEF systems are not an east coast or west coast or heartland issue; it is a nationwide disaster,” said Lee Zeldin, EPA administrator. “I have heard from truck drivers, farmers and many others complaining about DEF and pleading for a fix in all 50 states I visited during my first year as EPA administrator. Americans are justified in being fed up with failing DEF system issues. EPA understands this is a massive issue and has been doing everything in our statutory power to address this. Today, we take another step in furthering our work by removing DEF sensors. Farmers and truckers should not be losing billions of dollars because of repair costs or days lost on the job.”

According to the EPA, removing DEF sensors will provide immediate relief and save billions of dollars in repairs and lost productivity. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, the new guidance will save farmers $4.4 billion a year and this action will provide $13.79 billion a year of savings to Americans.

American Trucking Associations (ATA)

“The American Trucking Associations welcomes EPA’s updated guidance providing additional flexibility on diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) quality monitoring and preventing forced shutdowns,” ATA said. “As we have previously said, these systems have too often sidelined otherwise safe, compliant trucks due to faulty or unreliable DEF quality sensors, an issue that was compounded by widespread parts shortages in recent years. When a bad sensor can trigger a full inducement, the result is unnecessary downtime, unnecessary towing costs, strained supply chains, and higher costs across the board.”

According to ATA, EPA’s decision to provide manufacturers with flexibility to suspend these inducements—and eliminate problematic sensors altogether by monitoring a truck’s actual emissions—is a pragmatic solution that reflects how these systems perform in the real world.

“ATA appreciates EPA’s willingness to listen to industry and act,” ATA said. “We will continue working with the agency and our industry partners to ensure emissions regulations are both effective and workable for the [people] who keep America’s goods moving.”

Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA)

“Small-business truckers have dealt with faulty diesel exhaust fluid systems for years, facing unexpected shutdowns and costly repairs that needlessly take trucks off the road,” OOIDA said. “These are serious operational and safety concerns. We appreciate EPA Administrator Zeldin for listening to the concerns of America’s truckers and issuing commonsense guidance that keeps our supply chain moving.”

Dana Guthrie

Dana Guthrie is an award-winning journalist who has been featured in multiple newspapers, books and magazines across the globe. She is currently based in the Atlanta, Georgia, area.

Avatar for Dana Guthrie
Dana Guthrie is an award-winning journalist who has been featured in multiple newspapers, books and magazines across the globe. She is currently based in the Atlanta, Georgia, area.
For over 30 years, the objective of The Trucker editorial team has been to produce content focused on truck drivers that is relevant, objective and engaging. After reading this article, feel free to leave a comment about this article or the topics covered in this article for the author or the other readers to enjoy. Let them know what you think! We always enjoy hearing from our readers.

5 Comments

The EPA is a cancer on the industry. Instead of improving equipment, its durability, and efficiency, this scam is strangling and destroying the industry, while costs rise and the entire economy is stifled. But the “regulators” of this scam are getting rich off the general devastation.

What’s the alternative for more air pollution, lung diseases and Black rain poisoning our waterways just for a few dollars and an inconvenience ? I’ve paid heavily over the years due to DEF issues but I thought I was supposed to leave the planet better than I found it at the end of the day ??? You do know you can write of those inconveniences right ?

About time this mess is coming to an end on this DEF. But a little to late for me because of this DEF. out of my pocket I sent more than 30K trying to keep my truck moving an trying to keep a roof an food in my family’s mouth but too late I’ve lost my truck an my living and my small business. If I knew I could sue the individuals that started this DEF crap. I would hire a lawyer in a heart beat, thousands of my hard earned dollars on that mess.. I would love to sue these people an make them pay me back on everything I had to spend on that def mess..

they need to get rid of DEF all together. My wife worked in a water lab for years. Everything ends up on the water! Look up the EPA’s Oxygas program from the 90’s. It quietly stopped when the added chemicals was showing up in people’s well water testing! I’d bet cancer hit a high in the effected areas.
As for the DEF problem, I broke down, ended up in a motel for 5 days, lost 5 days of income, and cost $1,200. For a net zero gain! *cleaner air (bs), don’t drink the water!

All def system requirements need to be eliminated / meaning on all vehicles / Plus no EGR valve requirements / Take the EGR valves out of todays engines / To aim for total complete efficiency is the best way to run a clean machine !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE