TheTrucker.com

Congestion resulting in avoided highway auto trips, survey shows

Reading Time: 2 minutes
Congestion resulting in avoided highway auto trips, survey shows

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Travel Association released a survey last month that it said shows Americans avoided an estimated 47.5 million auto trips in 2018 because of highway congestion, equivalent to the loss of $30 billion in travel spending and 248,000 jobs, according to the organization’s economists.

According to an article in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Journal, the survey also found that comfortable majorities of American auto travelers would prefer to pay more in user fees to fund system improvements rather than sit in traffic, noted Roger Dow, the group’s president and CEO.

“The infrastructure discussion tends to grind to a political halt when it turns to resources,” he said in a statement. “So, we tested the funding question with polling. The interesting thing we found is that Americans are willing to pay more as long as their money is explicitly used to improve transportation in their region.”

Key findings from the survey include:

  • For each additional hour traffic adds to a weekend car trip, travel demand drops by an average of about 18 percent.
  • Two-thirds (66.1 percent) of auto travelers said they would rather pay an additional $2 to $3 each way to fund transportation projects than sit for an additional 1.5 to two hours in traffic each way.
  • More respondents (60 percent) said traffic congestion would be a greater deterrent to car travel than a 25-cent increase in gas taxes (40 percent).
  • Overall, most auto travelers (80 percent) said that additional gas taxes will not negatively impact the frequency of their travel by car. Among these travelers, nearly 89 percent said up to a 25-cent gas tax increase would not negatively impact their car travel.

When told Congress is considering proposals to increase other taxes and fees on drivers that would result in transportation improvements, 64.8 percent of auto travelers said they are “willing” to support such proposals.

Yet 23 percent said they are “unwilling” to support such proposals because there is no assurance that the funding would go to projects in their region.

“Our survey gave travelers a choice: would you rather pay more, or continue to sit in traffic? And two-thirds said they would rather pay a little more,” Dow said. “We hope that gives Congress some encouragement to make difficult decisions, because data shows us that inaction is putting the brakes on connectivity and prosperity.”

 

 

The Trucker News Staff

The Trucker News Staff produces engaging content for not only TheTrucker.com, but also The Trucker Newspaper, which has been serving the trucking industry for more than 30 years. With a focus on drivers, the Trucker News Staff aims to provide relevant, objective content pertaining to the trucking segment of the transportation industry. The Trucker News Staff is based in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Avatar for The Trucker News Staff
The Trucker News Staff produces engaging content for not only TheTrucker.com, but also The Trucker Newspaper, which has been serving the trucking industry for more than 30 years. With a focus on drivers, the Trucker News Staff aims to provide relevant, objective content pertaining to the trucking segment of the transportation industry. The Trucker News Staff is based in Little Rock, Arkansas.
For over 30 years, the objective of The Trucker editorial team has been to produce content focused on truck drivers that is relevant, objective and engaging. After reading this article, feel free to leave a comment about this article or the topics covered in this article for the author or the other readers to enjoy. Let them know what you think! We always enjoy hearing from our readers.

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE